Time to Bee Kind
26 Sep 2012
Insecticides used in Boulder County and elsewhere are threatening bees’ survival—and ours with it
Bees are essential to local agriculture and beyond, but insecticides used here and elsewhere are threatening their survival—and ours with it. By Sarah Warner Bees around the world are dying at unprecedented rates from an alarming phenomenon known as Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD). Beekeepers worldwide—and in Boulder County—have lost between 30 to 60 percent of their hives each year. The colony doesn’t leave the hive; it just dies from within. “In the past six years, we’ve lost somewhere between 4.5 and 12 million colonies of bees,” says Boulder County beekeeper Tom Theobald. “I’ve seen it in my own operation. I’ve seen a significant decline in the number of colonies that I’m able to keep alive. My honey crop this past season was the lowest in 36 years. Two years ago, we had the lowest honey crop ever recorded since records have ever been kept.” So, two years ago Theobald began to pull research documents from the Environmental Protection Agency in Washington, D.C. He discovered that the EPA knew a new breed of systemic pesticides was harmful to bees. (Systemic pesticides become one with the plant for the life of the plant; anything that chews or sucks on the plant is affected, as is the soil the plant grows in.) Yet, the agency did nothing to actively restrict these products from infiltrating the marketplace. In fact, they can be purchased at Home Depot, McGuckin, Lowe’s, etc. Neonicotinoid insecticides, which are part of the systemic pesticide family, are derived from nicotine and developed by Bayer CropScience. Two that are particularly toxic to honeybees are clothianidin and imidacloprid. Some commercial composts actually contain imidacloprid, often described on the label as “vine weevil protection.” These have been allowed out onto the marketplace, unrestricted, for more than eight years.Plants Bees Love
Plant the following on your property, tend to them organically, and your bees will love you: Clover, agastache, aster, bee balm, blue mist spirea, fennel, larkspur, lavender, sage, trumpet vine, sunflower, sedum, coriander, catnip, mint, parsley, marigold, phlox, bachelor’s button, zinnia, cosmos, salvia, shasta daisy, iris, coneflower, lobelia, delphinium, dogwood, blueberry, giant hyssop, linden, cherry, plum and willow. Also, bees need a reliable source of shallow, clean water. Put rocks or sticks in the water container so they won’t drown. —S.W.Theobald’s published writing on his discoveries has since spurred the EPA to revise some policies. However, the agency continues to allow untested chemicals, including a new one called sulfoxaflor, to be released with the knowledge that it’s highly toxic to pollinators. Last September, in an exposé by journalist Dan Rather, Theobald, along with academic researchers and other beekeepers, publicly discussed this new class of systemic pesticides. Some countries are responding quickly. In July, the French Ministry of Agriculture issued a ban on the use of another neonicotinoid insecticide, thiamethoxam, produced by Swiss chemical giant Syngenta. But other countries, including the U.S., continue to use systemic pesticides. Farmers like them because crops require fewer sprays. In addition, systemic pesticides have the least direct impact on mammals, including humans. Since September 2012 more definitive studies by Jeff Pettis of the Bee Research Laboratory in Beltsville, Md., have shown that these pesticides weaken bees’ immune systems, development, learning capacity and memory. Dr. Jim Frazier at Penn State University also conducted studies of bees from hives across the United States and found an average of six, and in some cases as many as 39, pesticides in these bees. Some of these were systemic. “I think no one had any idea that it could be this large of a residue problem,” Frazier says. “And because the residue consists of insecticides, fungicides, herbicides and miticides that differ in different places across the country—combinations of five, six or seven of these materials—there is no toxicological literature that exists for the consequences of these combinations when they are ingested by honeybees or any other insects.” He explains that short-term toxicological consequences are easier to test than long-term effects, which are more complicated to track.